Wednesday, December 2, 2009

IDOLISING CHARLES MANSON IS IDIOTIC



The only man of energy
Yes, the revolution's pride
He trained a hundred women
Just to kill an unborn child
Leonard Cohen


The following message is an open letter to anyone espousing the views of Charles Manson (hippy cult leader and convicted serial killer) and venerating him as if he was a hero...
Could you please clarify your intentions - it is obvious that a single collaborative global community would be a better world, but how is associating yourself or this standpoint with Charles Manson going to help our cause?
From your tone I detect that it is likely that you are sincere in your belief that Manson was not responsible for the killings, I wasn't there so I don't know, but this is irrelevant - everybody thinks he is a mass murderer, why attach a noble cause to such baggage?
William Blake wrote 'All Religions Are One' two hundred years ago - why not associate yourselves with him?
The list goes on and on and on - why not John Lennon? Krishnamurthi? Jim Morrison?  Buddha? Leonard Cohen?
Clearly he was charismatic and spoke some truth, but there are so many others who have expressed the same ideals with greater eloquence and without so many negative connotations for so many people. How can you expect to achieve anything in this manner?
At times I have considered distancing myself from the cause because I might not be its most wholesome spokesperson - this seems utterly absurd when compared to the amount of damage you might be doing by connecting your beautiful ideals with a convicted serial killer.
The only conclusion I can reach is that you are opposed to peace, that everything you say is a lie, a lie designed to sully the cause you pretend to espouse. If I am just confused please set me straight
x 

I wrote the above letter because I heard the Leonard Cohen song 'The Future' and wondered what he meant by his prediction:-


"all the lousy little poets coming round, tryin' to sound like Charlie Manson"
Leonard Cohen


So I Googled to find out what "tryin' to sound like Charlie Manson" would entail - to my alarm he sounds very like me, except not a pacifist. I would like to believe this is a critical difference.


"Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that"
Martin Luther King Jr


On reflection there are two other differences that I would like to point out - his grasp of the English Language is primitive and he is a hippy - I AM NOT A HIPPY. 


Thank you, goodnight


x



Do I look like a hippy to you? I would love to be a hippy, but it is not in my nature.
I intend to be Sawbridgeworth's foremost not-a-hippy advocate of hippy ideas.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

THE KEYS TO A FULL UNDERSTANDING OF BLAKE


'Sconfitta', William Blake


[ORIGINALLY POSTED AS A MESSAGE BOARD COMMENT ON THE ABOVE ILLUSTRATION AT http://paulocoelhoblog.com/2008/08/07/image-of-the-day-sconfitta-by-william-blake]

The image titled 'Sconfitta' is dark, powerful and beautiful - typical of Blake's best work. It is wonderful to see so many people reconsidering Blake - it was his own intention to "speak to future generations via a sublime allegory"

Without knowing anything of Blake we can see this much:

On the surface we see a man engaged in worshipping or appealing to a dark Sun.

At second glance the geometry of the picture reveals the Sun is a big, black cross with a circle at the centre, suggesting he is engaged in Son worship, and that which he worships is not fully illumninated to him, it is shrouded in darkness.

It could be the print quality, but one can discern a crucifix that has been painted over, or subtley suggested at within the Sun upon the hill.

Wanbliska (a contributor to the message borad where I origainlly posted this article) mentions the Four Zoas central to Blake's more cryptic and elaborate later works. In 'Jerusalem' Blake gives us a diagram of The Zoas as four interlocking circles, at the centre is a single egg containing the words 'Adam' and 'Satan' - like the familiar Vesica Piscis diagram, also frequently appearing in Blake's work, this fourfold equivalent encodes the nature of the Son of God (I have reproduced this figure further down the page).

BELOW: The top right figure is the Vesica Piscis






Blake says 'Good is the Passive that obeys reason, Evil is the active springing from Energy' - like Yin and Yang they are different halves of the same thing, as depicted in the egg I mentioned previously. Blake does not mention 'Christ' much in his work - this is because everything he describes is a single encoded message about the nature of the Son of God. To Blake (and, in my view, in truth) The Son of God is both Adam and Satan - The Son of God is Mankind in its current embryonic state (hence the egg, this is further clarified by illustrations from 'The Gates of Paradise', one labelled 'What is Man?' depicts a pupae that is also a baby wrapped in swaddling clothes, another a winged infant emerging from an egg)

So the cross in 'Sconfitta' represents the Four Zoas and the Sun is their Son.

The man worshipping the Sun has long white hair and robes, recalling the depiction of Urizen familiar from Blake's perhaps most famous painting, 'The Ancient of Days' - he is in the correct position according to the fourfold diagram I mentioned previously, which also backs up this assertion.

Yet Urizen is outside of and distinct from that which he kneels before.

The fish symbol of the early christian movement is a section from the Vesica Piscis, the section where the two circles interlock, the section representing The Son of God. While the later formalised Christianity took the cross as their exoteric symbol, the symbol is 'The Tripod of Life', not two interlocking circles (like the vesica piscis) or four (as Blake depicts in his fourfold diagram of the Four Zoas and their relationship to Adam and Satan) but three - Urizen is not included in this Trinity.

BELOW: The top left figure is 'The Tripod of Life',  a common symbol for The Trinity in Catholicism,  along with two alternative common geometrical representations of 'The Trinity'. In this illustration I am cheekily suggesting that these geometric figures for the Trinity are the meaning of  the infamous 'Number of the Beast' mentioned in Revelations -




It is interesting to note here that Tolkien's Ailundale describes four principle 'Angels', though 'Melkor' (equivalent to the archetype of Urizen in Blake's cosmology) is excluded from this quaternity when he seeks to impose his own order on creation, though this starts with good intentions his works are the source of all conflict in the middle Earth legandarium). Only the names are changed - this direct equaivalence between Tolkien and Blake's cosmology is further clarified by the cover illustration of 'The Silmarillion', by Tolkien himself - it is the central section of Blake's diagrammatic representation of The Four Zoas -



Blake says 'God only acts and is in existing beings of men' - God is Mankind, is Adam is Satan is Urizen - there is only ONE.

I would disagree with Alexandria that Blake's vision is fundamentally negative - anyone who looks with open eyes upon this epoch can see the suffering and also its beauty and majesty, and this is reflected in Blake's work. But his message is ultimateley positive, that the suffering is for a purpose and of a finite duration, that 'now is the return of Adam to paradise':

"The ancient tradition that the world will be consumed in fire at the end of six thousand years is true, as I have heard from Hell. For the cherub with his flaming sword is hereby commanded to leave his guard at tree of life; and when he does, the whole creation will be consumed and appear infinite and holy, whereas it now appears finite and corrupt. This will come to pass by an improvement of sensual enjoyment. But first the notion that man has a body distinct from his soul is to be expunged; this I shall do by printing in the infernal method, by corrosives, which in Hell are salutary and medicinal, melting apparent surfaces away, and displaying the infinite which was hid. If the doors of perception were cleansed everything would appear to man as it is, infinite. For man has closed himself up till he sees all things thro' narrow chinks of his cavern." Blake, 'The Marriage of Heaven and Hell'

Josh

jester.me.uk

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

WEAPONS OF MASS INSTRUCTION

CONTROL OF THE METANARRATIVE IS ABSOLUTE CONTROL.
ART IS POWER.




WEAPONS OF MASS INSTRUCTION

Information IS mightier than the gun
They shot John Lennon down, but The Word lives on.

Art IS mightier than cancer
It took Bob Marley from us, but it could not kill our song.

Hand granades are harmless,
'Tis the man who pulls the pin.
The stories in him made him do it
The Storyteller put them in!


THE ARTISTS ARE ORGANISING INTO ARMED SOVIETS,
COLLECTIVES PREPARED TO RESORT TO EXTREME ACTS OF AUDIO-VISUAL TERRORISM

ARTISTS OF ALL COUNTRIES UNITE!


jesTer

11.11.09




"Whoever controls the media controls the mind."
Jim Morrison